HB1107 LEGISLATIVE ALERT
(Johnson, Lamborn)
Status: House AG Committee
Audubon Position: OPPOSE!
This is a "takings" bill introduced by Rep. Steve Johnson (R-District 49)
and is basically a rehash of a similar bill introduced by him in last
year's session. In general, "takings' bills are efforts to
make the larger
community financially liable for "financial damages"
perceived to have been
suffered by property owners when a desired use of their
property is not
permitted due to existing regulations. To date, virtually
no takings bills
have passed in Colorado. The courts have defined a
"takings" as when a
property owner was denied "reasonable economic" use of their
property.
Unfortunately the property rights folks are trying to
redefine "takings" as
meaning that they weren't able to maximize the financial use
of their
property because of regulatory restrictions imposed for the
sake of the
greater public good.
Your telephone calls are needed no later than Monday
(01/21/02) to members
of the House Agriculture, Livestock, and Natural Resources
Committee. The
members of that committee may be contacted, as follows:
MEMBER'S
CAPITOL HOME
NAME D/R DIST.
PHONE PHONE
Chairman: Dianne Hoppe R 65 303-866-3706
970-522-3237
Vice-Chair: Kay L. Alexander R 58 303-866-2955
970-249-5862
Member: Mary Hodge D 36 303-866-2912
303-659-3298
Member: Bryan Jameson D 52 303-866-4569
970-581-6941
Member: Steve Johnson R 49 303-866-2907
970-223-8045
Member: Carl Miller D 61 303-866-2952
719-486-0636
Member: Tom Plant D 13 303-866-2938
303-258-7459
Member: Gregg P. Rippy R 57 303-866-2945
970-945-7731
Member: Jim Snook R 60 303-866-2963
719-589-2608
Member: Lois Tochtrop D 34 303-866-2931
303-469-9217
HB1107 BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
AUDUBON OF COLORADO
RESPECTFULLY OPPOSES HB1107: PROTECTION AGAINST REGULATORY
IMPAIRMENTS
HB1107 provides a cause of action against the state of
Colorado, its
agencies, its citizen boards, commissions, councils, and
institutions of
higher education, as well as all local governments, for any
regulatory
action, which burdens a private interest in property. HB1107
expressly and
explicitly applies where no court would find that a taking
of property had
occurred.
Currently the law does not require the citizens of Colorado,
through their
elected governments, to pay for every cost associated with
complying with
measures implemented to protect the health, safety, welfare
and property
rights of neighboring property owners.
· HB1107 GOES FAR BEYOND EXISTING STATUTORY OR
CONSTITUTIONAL
PROTECTIONS AGAINST THE TAKING OF PRIVATE PROPERTY.
HB1107 proposes to protect private interests in property
from “restrictions"
and "limits" which may not clearly amount to a takings as
that term is
currently construed under the Colorado or United States
Constitution"
[ 29-20-201 (c) ]
· HB1107 IS NOT BALANCED
Existing property law and the court decisions interpreting
it require a
balance between the rights of the individual and the
rights of the
community. HB1107 looks only at the effects of regulations
on the
regulated and does not consider the needs of the community
· A PROPERTY RIGHT IS NOT AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT
Property owners have never been allowed to use their
property in a way,
which injures others. HB1107 would change this central
tenet of property
law.
When we require environmental controls, there is a cost to
the property
owner. The absence of the controls is a cost to everyone
else.
· HB1107 IS TOO EXPENSIVE
We either do not regulate or pay for the consequences or
do regulate and
pay for the privilege.